Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40085085›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Therapy Dogs for Anxiety in Children in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Heather P Kelker, Huma K Siddiqui, Alan M Beck, Jeffrey A Kline

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03784573 (Canine-Assisted Anxiety Reduction In Emergency Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03784573 nacompletednot on this map

Canine-Assisted Anxiety Reduction In Emergency Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsAnxiety, Opioid Use, Children, Therapy DogArmsDog + handler, No dog
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Perioperative pet presence: Bridging compassion and clinical safety.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather P KelkerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Huma K SiddiquiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Alan M BeckCenter for Human Animal Bond, Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine, Lafayette, Indiana.
Jeffrey A KlineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prior evidence suggests that the use of therapy dogs in emergency care reduces anxiety in adults, but no trial has tested the use of therapy dogs in emergency care of children. Objective: To examine whether adjunctive use of therapy dogs in standard child-life therapy reduces child-reported and parent-reported child anxiety in a pediatric emergency department (ED). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, at an academic pediatric ED. Children (aged 5-17 years) with suspected moderate to high anxiety were included. Intervention: All participants received standard child-life therapy, and the intervention group was randomly assigned to have exposure to a therapy dog and handler for approximately 10 minutes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Anxiety was measured using the 0- to 10-point FACES scale (with 0 indicating no anxiety and 10 indicating very severe anxiety) and salivary cortisol concentrations. Measurements were obtained at baseline (T0), 45 minutes (T1), and 120 minutes (T2) for both child and parents. Results: A total of 80 patients (mean [SD] age, 10.9 [3.8] years; 45 [56%] female) were enrolled (40 in the control group and 40 in the intervention group). At T0, the mean (SD) FACES scores were 5.4 (2.8) for child report and 6.4 (2.4) for parent report; the means were not different between groups. From T0 to T1, child-reported anxiety changed by a mean (SD) of -1.5 (3.4) points in the control group vs -2.7 (2.5) points in the intervention group (P = .02, Mann-Whitney U test); similarly, mean (SD) parent-estimated child anxiety changed by -1.8 (2.7) points in the control group vs -3.2 (2.3) points in the intervention group (P = .008). A total of 9 children (23%) in the control group had a greater than 2.5-point decrease in FACES score vs 18 (46%) in intervention group (P = .04, Fisher test). At T2, mean (SD) child-reported FACES scores decreased to 3.6 (3.4) points in the control group and 3.0 (2.7) points in the intervention group (P = .70). A total of 14 control participants (35%) received ketamine, midazolam, lorazepam, or droperidol vs 7 (18%) in the intervention group (P = .08, Fisher test). Child and parent salivary cortisol decreased from T0 to T1 in both groups but was not different between groups. Parental salivary cortisol was significantly consistently higher than their children's salivary cortisol (P < .001, unpaired t test, for comparisons of child vs parent at T0 and T1 in both groups). Conclusions and Relevance: This study of adjunctive use of therapy dogs in standard child-life therapy found a modest but significantly greater reduction in both child-reported and parental-reported child anxiety in the pediatric ED for the intervention vs control group. These findings support the use of therapy dogs to help reduce pain and anxiety without the use of chemical or physical constraint. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784573.

Indexed as

Animal Assisted TherapyAnxietyEmergency Service, HospitalAdolescentAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDogsFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMaleSalivaTreatment OutcomeHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID40085085
PMCPMC11909607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.