ArticleInvestigative radiology2026
Deuterium Metabolic Imaging of the Human Abdomen at Clinical Field Strength.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the Origin of the Brain Semi-Heavy Water Deuterium MR Signal Following Administration of Deuterated Metabolic Substrate: A Cautionary Tale.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Advanced methods in deuterium metabolic imaging.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Deuterium metabolic imaging beyond the brain: mapping tissue metabolism across the body.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Combining DMI and [European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Article
- Feasibility of High-Resolution Deuterium Metabolic Imaging of the Human Kidney Using Concentric Ring Trajectory Sampling at 7T.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Potential of Metabolic MRI to Address Unmet Clinical Needs in Localised Kidney Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Deuterium magnetic resonance imaging of tumors using low-dose systemic deuterated water labeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the study was to translate abdominal deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) to clinical field strength by optimizing the radiofrequency coil setup, the administered dose of deuterium ( 2 H)-labeled glucose, and the data processing pipeline for quantitative characterization of DMI signals over time. This was assessed in the kidney and liver to establish a basis for routine clinical studies in the future. MATERIALS AND
methods5 healthy volunteers were recruited and imaged on 2 or 3 separate occasions, with varying doses of 2 H-glucose: 0.75 g/kg (high dose), 0.50 g/kg (medium dose), and 0.25 g/kg (low dose), resulting in a total of 13 DMI scan sessions. DMI was performed at 3 T using a flexible 20 × 30 cm 2 2 H-tuned transmit-receive surface coil. For quantitative comparisons across scans, the 2 H-glucose signal was normalized against the sum of 2 H-glucose and 2 H-water (GGW ratio). To quantify the time course of GGW, 3 novel metrics of metabolism were defined and compared between doses and organs: the maximum value across the time course (GGW max ), the sum over the whole time course (GGW AUC ), and the average signal across a defined plateau (GGW mean plateau ). The 2 H-lipid signal overlaps with 2 H-lactate; hence, the 2 signals were measured as the combined 2 H-lipid+lactate signal.
resultsThe careful positioning of a dedicated surface coil minimized unwanted gastric signals while maintaining excellent hepatic and renal measurements. The time courses derived from the liver and kidney were reproducible and comparable across different doses, showing the potential for dose reduction. The signal from the liver plateaued at approximately 30 minutes, and that from the kidney at approximately 40 minutes. The liver exhibited higher quantitative values for 2 H-glucose uptake compared to the kidney, a trend consistent across all 3 quantitative metrics and doses, for example, for the highest dose: GGW AUC liver = 31 ± 3; GGW AUC kidney = 27 ± 3; P = 0.05. A trend toward lower quantitative measurements with decreasing dose was observed: this was significant between the high and the low dose for all 3 parameters and between the medium and low dose for GGW mean plateau and GGW AUC , but was not significant between the high and the medium dose for any of the 3 parameters. The hepatic 2 H-lipid+lactate signal increased over 70-90 minutes in 12/13 cases (mean: 39 ± 24%), while the renal lipid+lactate signal increased in only 8/13 cases (mean: 5 ± 17%). The hepatic 2 H-water signal increased in all 13 cases (mean: 18 ± 10%), and the renal 2 H-water signal increased in only 10/13 cases (mean: 10 ± 13%).
conclusionsDMI of the human abdomen is feasible using a clinical magnetic resonance imaging system and the signal changes measured in the kidney and liver can serve as a reference for future clinical studies. The 2 H-glucose dose can be reduced from 0.75 to 0.50 g/kg to minimize gastric signal without substantially affecting the reliability of organ quantification. The increase in 2 H-lipid+lactate or 2 H-water signal over time could serve as direct and indirect measures of metabolism, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.