ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025
Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07621198 (Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Major Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Major Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study in Low- and Middle-income Settings
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Protocol for implementation of intraoperative adverse event recording during WHO checklist sign-out.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntra- and postoperative adverse events (AEs) are devastating to patients and costly for healthcare systems. In 2008, the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was introduced to minimize morbidity and mortality and to enhance team performance. It consists of three parts whereof the third part, the sign-out at the end of surgery, is generally performed poorly. Addressing intraoperative AEs and discussion of the consecutive postoperative management should take place during this often-omitted sign-out. To address this issue, a national, multicentre quality improvement project (CIBOSurg-ClassIntra® for Better Outcomes in Surgery) is currently being conducted in Switzerland. This project evaluates the effectiveness and implementation of systematic recording of intraoperative AEs using ClassIntra® (a generic classification system for intraoperative AEs) and an interdisciplinary discussion during the sign-out. The current study, conducted in the preimplementation phase of CIBOSurg, aims to assess existing practices and determinants concerning the future implementation of systematic recording of intraoperative AEs, perceptions surrounding ClassIntra®, and its implementation during sign-out.
methodsA qualitative context analysis was conducted across eight hospitals in Switzerland and one in the Netherlands. Nearly 100 semistructured interviews were conducted with interdisciplinary staff from different surgical disciplines. Data were analysed using rapid analysis and concept-structuring qualitative content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change.
resultsFindings indicate that the sign-out is not yet implemented consistently at every participating hospital. Currently, intraoperative AEs are not being systematically recorded and discussed, despite recognition of their importance. Most interviewees considered the application and implementation of ClassIntra® to be feasible and were convinced that a systematic recording of intraoperative AEs and interdisciplinary discussion among the operative team during sign-out is particularly useful for learning and postoperative patient care. Several barriers and facilitators to the successful recording and discussion of intraoperative AEs were identified.
conclusionThe study results provide important information about current practices, while also generating insights on how to better discuss and systematically record intraoperative AEs and improve sign-out performance. Future implementation of ClassIntra® is generally perceived positively. The findings address a critical gap in surgical safety practice and provide a basis for developing multifaceted implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.