Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40085070›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.

Monika Finsterwald, Zuzanna Kita, Salome Dell-Kuster, Katrin Burri-Winkler, Anne Auderset, Judith Winkens, Christoph S Burkhart, Amanda van Vegten, Lauren Clack

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07621198 (Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Major Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07621198 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Major Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study in Low- and Middle-income Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Departamental de VillavicencioRan2026 to 2027Enrolled364ConditionsMajor SurgeryArmsPatients with postoperative complications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monika FinsterwaldInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, Zürich 8006, Switzerland.
Zuzanna KitaQuality Management and Patient Safety, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zürich 8091, Switzerland.
Salome Dell-KusterClinic for Anaesthesia, Intermediate Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel 4031, Switzerland.
Katrin Burri-WinklerClinic for Anaesthesia, Intermediate Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel 4031, Switzerland.
Anne AudersetClinic for Anaesthesia, Intermediate Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel 4031, Switzerland.
Judith WinkensPatient Safety, Chief Medical Office, Lindenhofgruppe Berne, Bremgartenstrasse 117, Bern 3001, Switzerland.
Christoph S BurkhartDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, ICU and Rescue Medicine Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, Chur 7000, Switzerland.
Amanda van VegtenQuality Management and Patient Safety, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zürich 8091, Switzerland.
Lauren ClackInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, Zürich 8006, Switzerland.

Funding

Federal Committee of Quality Switzerland and from the Foundation for Research and Education in Anaesthesia, Basel, Switzerland Grant number NAFoundation for Research and Education, University of Basel, Switzerland Grant number NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra- and postoperative adverse events (AEs) are devastating to patients and costly for healthcare systems. In 2008, the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was introduced to minimize morbidity and mortality and to enhance team performance. It consists of three parts whereof the third part, the sign-out at the end of surgery, is generally performed poorly. Addressing intraoperative AEs and discussion of the consecutive postoperative management should take place during this often-omitted sign-out. To address this issue, a national, multicentre quality improvement project (CIBOSurg-ClassIntra® for Better Outcomes in Surgery) is currently being conducted in Switzerland. This project evaluates the effectiveness and implementation of systematic recording of intraoperative AEs using ClassIntra® (a generic classification system for intraoperative AEs) and an interdisciplinary discussion during the sign-out. The current study, conducted in the preimplementation phase of CIBOSurg, aims to assess existing practices and determinants concerning the future implementation of systematic recording of intraoperative AEs, perceptions surrounding ClassIntra®, and its implementation during sign-out.

methodsA qualitative context analysis was conducted across eight hospitals in Switzerland and one in the Netherlands. Nearly 100 semistructured interviews were conducted with interdisciplinary staff from different surgical disciplines. Data were analysed using rapid analysis and concept-structuring qualitative content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change.

resultsFindings indicate that the sign-out is not yet implemented consistently at every participating hospital. Currently, intraoperative AEs are not being systematically recorded and discussed, despite recognition of their importance. Most interviewees considered the application and implementation of ClassIntra® to be feasible and were convinced that a systematic recording of intraoperative AEs and interdisciplinary discussion among the operative team during sign-out is particularly useful for learning and postoperative patient care. Several barriers and facilitators to the successful recording and discussion of intraoperative AEs were identified.

conclusionThe study results provide important information about current practices, while also generating insights on how to better discuss and systematically record intraoperative AEs and improve sign-out performance. Future implementation of ClassIntra® is generally perceived positively. The findings address a critical gap in surgical safety practice and provide a basis for developing multifaceted implementation strategies.

Indexed as

ChecklistIntraoperative ComplicationsHumansInterviews as TopicNetherlandsPatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementSurgical Procedures, OperativeSwitzerlandadverse eventsClassIntra®context analysisimplementation sciencepatient safetyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40085070
PMCPMC11988435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.