Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084979›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical research and opinion2025

Effects of the Part D Senior Savings Model on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare costs.

Chi Chun Steve Tsang, Xiangjun Zhang, Ashley Ellis, Jessie Jiaqi Zeng, Junling Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical research and opinion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi Chun Steve TsangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9748-0666
Xiangjun ZhangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-2590
Ashley EllisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jessie Jiaqi ZengRuben S. Ayala High School, Chino Hills, CA, USA.
Junling WangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-6227

Funding

Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Alzheimer's-Type Dementia with MTM ServicesR01AG040146 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI Junling None Wang · 2011 to 2026
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services tested the Part D Senior Savings Model ("PDSS Model") in 2021, capping monthly out-of-pocket (OOP) insulin costs at $35. Diabetes disproportionately affects racial/ethnic minorities compared to their non-Hispanic White (White) counterparts, so this study compared the changes in racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare costs among insulin users between Medicare and non-Medicare populations in 2021.

methodsThis study analyzed the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2020-2021). The intervention group comprised Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65, while the comparison group included a near-elderly non-Medicare population. The study outcomes included annual OOP/total costs in 2021 dollars for insulin, medication, health services (medical), and overall healthcare. A difference-in-differences-in-differences approach was employed to assess the PDSS Model's effects between White and each racial/ethnic minority group.

resultsThe weighted sample included 1,056,386 insulin users (53.89% intervention). In 2020, among the intervention group, non-Hispanic Black (Black) and Hispanic had similar or higher insulin costs than White patients. Black-White differences in OOP insulin costs were lowered more among the intervention group (cost ratio [CR] = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.06-0.22) than the comparison group. Black-White differences in OOP costs for medication, health services, and overall healthcare widened more among the intervention group by 61-64%. These patterns were not seen for other racial/ethnic disparities.

conclusionsAmong insulin users, Black may have benefited more from the PDSS Model than White patients, which may be associated with enhanced insulin access and lower needs for other healthcare. Future studies should examine the long-term and heterogeneous impact of the PDSS Model.

Indexed as

Cost SavingsDiabetes MellitusHealth Care CostsHealthcare DisparitiesMedicare Part DAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanEthnicityFemaleHealth ExpendituresHispanic or LatinoHumansInsulinMaleUnited StatesInsulindiabetesDisparitieshealthcare costMedicareSenior Savings Model

Identifiers

PMID40084979
PMCPMC12018076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.