ReviewEpigenomics2025
Insight into the role of DNA methylation in prognosis and treatment response prediction of gastrointestinal cancers.
Review in Epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetics and Molecular Mechanisms in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The nutrigenomic-epigenetic axis in cancer: from dietary bioactives to precision oncology.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Review
- Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Molecular Pathogenesis, Metabolic Vulnerabilities, and Therapeutic Potential of Sorghum Polyphenols.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2026Review
- Senescence-associated and immune-related 9p21.3 locus genes in colorectal cancer: epigenetic architecture, molecular landscape and therapeutic possibilities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers impose a significant disease burden, underscoring the critical importance of accurate prognosis prediction and treatment response evaluation. DNA methylation, one of the most extensively studied epigenetic modifications, has gained prominence due to its reliable measurement across various sample types. Numerous studies have reported that DNA methylation was linked to the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response in malignancies, including GI cancers. While its diagnostic role in GI cancers has been comprehensively reviewed. Recent research has increasingly highlighted its potential in prognosis prediction and treatment response evaluation. However, no existing reviews have exclusively focused on these two aspects. In this review, we retrieved relevant studies and included 230 of them in our discussion, thereby providing an overview of the clinical applicability of aberrant DNA methylation in these two fields among patients with esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic cancers, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of the current literature and propose directions for future research. Specifically, we emphasize the need for standardized DNA methylation methodologies and advocate for the integration of gene panels, rather than single genes, to address tumor heterogeneity more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.