Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084808›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2025

Failed by the System: A Content Analysis of Midwives' Experiences and Challenges When Providing Termination of Pregnancy Care.

Susanne Armour, Hazel Keedle, Andrea Gilkison, Hannah G Dahlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne ArmourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4881-1905
Hazel KeedleSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrea GilkisonSchool of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the experiences of midwives' when caring for women undergoing pregnancy termination after 14 weeks in Australia and New Zealand and the challenges they encounter. DESIGN AND

methodsContent analysis was used to analyse 1389 responses to 10 open text questions embedded in a web-based cross-sectional survey. Current understandings of grief and stigma were applied to the data. The SRQR guideline was used for reporting.

resultsData were grouped into four main categories: 'Failed by the system', 'Emotionally and morally challenged', 'Midwifery at the core' and 'Caring for myself'. Midwives strongly supported women's reproductive health choices and described delivering compassionate, woman-centred care during pregnancy termination. Midwives reported receiving minimal pre-registration education. Grief and sadness were prevalent emotions. Midwives described witnessing and experiencing abortion stigma. Other challenges that affected midwives' experiences included a lack of emotional and practical support. Self-care strategies did not provide enough relief to midwives to overcome the emotional impact of providing care.

conclusionMidwives believe they deliver the very best of midwifery care to women who undergo pregnancy termination after 14 weeks but are affected by significant grief. Midwives not only witness stigma but also experience this as care providers. Failed by the healthcare systems that employ them, they lack appropriate support to overcome the emotional and moral challenges they encounter. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedMidwiferyNurse MidwivesAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGriefHumansMiddle AgedNew ZealandPregnancySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40084808
PMCPMC12125539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.