ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2025
The value of real-world evidence in supporting targeted therapies for patients with rare oncogenic drivers in mNSCLC.
Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the ongoing discovery of various oncogenic driver mutations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), a precision medicine approach has emerged, characterized by targeted therapies for select patient populations. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) remain the gold standard for evaluating efficacy and safety of such therapies; however, RCTs evaluating treatments for rare oncogenic drivers still face limitations, given small populations, potentially long-time horizon for outcome events to occur, and underrepresentation of certain subgroups. For these targeted therapies, the complementary nature between real-world evidence (RWE) and RCT may expand the totality of evidence available, to better inform treatment decision-making. In particular, treatments for rare oncogenic drivers can benefit from RWE that provides additional, generalizable clinical insights for subgroups underrepresented or ineligible for RCT, or confirms outcomes observed in RCT. As a discipline, RWE has seen significant advances in methodology and healthcare stakeholder acceptability, with potential for even greater innovation, and presents a valuable opportunity to support decision-making around access and use of targeted therapies for rare oncogenic drivers in mNSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.