ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2025
Optimizing gene panels for equitable reproductive carrier screening: The Goldilocks approach.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The clinical utility of carrier screening.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Burden of heterozygote carriers for autosomal recessive conditions in the Middle East: A study of 14,392 genomes.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Integrating preconception carrier screening into public health: lessons learned from a pilot implementation study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Beyond carrier frequency: a preliminary multicenter study of simultaneous couple-based comprehensive carrier screening for common and rare genetic disorders.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic spectrum analysis of high-carrier-frequency monogenic disorders based on whole-exome sequencing in the Chinese general population.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Expanded Carrier Screening: Current Evidence and Future Directions in the Era of Population Genomics.Genes · 2026Review
- A dataset of estimated heterozygous individual and carrier couple frequencies for pan-ancestry carrier screening.Data in brief · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- AssociatedPublication
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProfessional organizations recommend pan-ancestry carrier screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions. Advances in DNA sequencing have allowed the analysis of hundreds of genes; however, the optimal number of genes for carrier screening remains unclear. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has proposed a tiered approach recommending screening for 113 genes.
methodsWe analyzed ClinVar and gnomAD v4.1.0, for genes associated with serious autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions and modeled screening performance across panels of varying compositions and sizes in diverse genetic ancestries. We also reevaluated the ACMG gene list using the updated gnomAD data.
resultsWe identified potential inconsistencies in the ACMG gene lists, particularly in the carrier test performance (defined as a positive yield) for underrepresented genetic ancestry groups. Modeling of the population data for 1310 genes revealed that the screening of 152, 248, 531, and 725 genes achieved 90%, 95%, 99%, and 99.7% positive yields, respectively, in couples. Real-world data from the screening of more than 60,000 couples were used to validate the model.
conclusionOur methodology optimizes the gene content of carrier screening panels for diverse ancestry groups, provides a mechanism for continually updating guidelines, ensures consistency with genomic population data, and improves equity across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40084622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.