ArticleAustralian dental journal2025
Cost-effectiveness of atraumatic restorative treatment combined with the Hall Technique for managing dental caries in remote Indigenous children.
Article in Australian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Utility Analysis of Treatments for Early Childhood Caries in Remote Aboriginal Communities.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026Article
- Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis in dental medicine: a systematic review with a focus on affordability and risk-aversion.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndigenous children in remote Australia face significant disparities in oral health and have limited access to dental care. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment combined with the Hall Technique (ART-HT) compared to usual care.
methodsA cost-effectiveness analysis using data from a 1-year ART-HT trial estimated dental caries status and costs from a health-provider perspective. Two scenarios were examined: (1) actual treatment costs and (2) minimum dental services. The incremental cost per decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) prevented was calculated in AUD 2021 prices. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted.
resultsAmong 228 children (ART-HT = 122; usual care = 106), deterministic analysis showed ART-HT required additional costs of $59.54 and $72.37 for scenarios 1 and 2, with 0.90 dmft prevented. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed ART-HT resulted in better oral health outcomes with a mean dmft prevented of 0.58 (95% uncertainty interval: 0.09 to1.07). The mean additional cost per dmft prevented was $118.50 and $181.84 for scenarios 1 and 2.
conclusionsART-HT effectively managed dental caries in Indigenous children, providing better oral health outcomes compared to usual care, albeit with modest additional costs. This approach may improve access to culturally appropriate dental care in remote communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.