Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084547›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026

Prevalence and Impact of Period and Pelvic Pain in Australian Adolescents: The PPEP Talk Schools Program.

Kate I Tomsett, Amelia K Mardon, Olivia W Gao, Annabelle K Simpson, Bridie C Squire, Indigo G Warner, Susan F Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence and Impact of Period and Pelvic Pain in Australian Adolescents: The PPEP Talk Schools Program.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kate I TomsettPelvic Pain Foundation of Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-3345-437X
Amelia K MardonReproductive Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3492-782X
Olivia W GaoFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Annabelle K SimpsonFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Bridie C SquireFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Indigo G WarnerFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Susan F EvansUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-604X

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2018 the Australian Government launched the world's first National Action Plan for Endometriosis (NAPE). Of its three priorities 'Priority 1' was 'Education and Awareness'. In response, the Pelvic Pain Foundation of Australia was funded to deliver their Periods, Pain and Endometriosis Program (PPEP) Talk to a proportion of Australian schools. Since then, PPEP Talk has been delivered to over 110,000 students.

aimsThis retrospective cross-sectional study investigated students assigned female at birth (AFAB) and the prevalence and impact of period and pelvic pain, interaction with health care services and knowledge of endometriosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsMultiple choice, pre and post PPEP Talk, paper survey responses between July 2022 and June 2023 were collected from 13,078 students AFAB.

results52.6% of students reported regular severe period pain. 22.9% of students reported regularly missing school or work with their period. 21.5% of students had presented to a health professional for pain, and 5.7% had presented to an Emergency Department. 5.2% of students reported pelvic pain for more than 10 days per month. The prevalence and impact of period and pelvic pain varied across demographic variables. The proportion of students who knew what endometriosis was rose from 47.8% to 95.5% after the program.

conclusionsThe NAPE's objective to enhance education and awareness of endometriosis and period/pelvic pain was met. 100% of schools who received PPEP Talk want it to return. Wide discrepancies in the prevalence of pain within different demographics were identified, providing previously unknown data to improve and direct services.

Indexed as

EndometriosisHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePelvic PainAdolescentAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceRetrospective Studiesadolescenteducationendometriosispelvic pain

Identifiers

PMID40084547
PMCPMC12867549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.