ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Age- and Sex-Specific Patterns in Adult Brain Network Segregation.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal changes in control energy of brain networks in older adults at familial risk for Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Preserved topography, lateralization, selectivity, and functional connectivity of the language network in older brains.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of the human cortical functional hierarchy across the lifespan.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Association between processing speed and segregation/integration of large-scale functional networks in middle-aged and older people living with HIV.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Spatially convergent functional MRI signatures of diabetes and male sex identify genetic vulnerabilities to accelerated brain ageing.Brain communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human brain is organized into several segregated associative and sensory functional networks, each responsible for various aspects of cognitive and sensory processing. These functional networks become less segregated over the adult lifespan, possibly contributing to cognitive decline that is observed during advanced age. To date, a comprehensive understanding of decreasing network segregation with age has been hampered by (1) small sample sizes, (2) lack of investigation at different spatial scales, (3) the limited age range of participants, and more importantly (4) an inadequate consideration of sex (biological females and males) differences. This study aimed to address these shortcomings. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 357 cognitively intact participants (18.2-91.8 years; 49.9 ± 17.1 years; 27.70 ± 1.72 MoCA score, 203 [56.8%] females), and the segregation index (defined as one minus the ratio of between-network connectivity to within-network connectivity) was calculated at three spatial scales of brain networks: whole-brain network, intermediate sensory and associative networks, as well as core visual (VIS), sensorimotor (SMN), frontoparietal (FPN), ventral attention (VAN), dorsal attention (DAN), and default mode networks (DMN). Where applicable, secondary within-, between-, and pairwise connectivity analyses were also conducted to investigate the origin of any observed age and sex effects on network segregation. For any given functional metric, linear and quadratic age effects, sex effects, and respective age by sex interaction effects were assessed using backwards iterative linear regression modeling. Replicating previous work, brain networks were found to become less segregated across adulthood. Specifically, negative quadratic decreases in whole-brain network, intermediate associative network, VAN, and DMN segregation index were observed. Intermediate sensory networks, VIS, and SMN exhibited negative linear decreases in segregation index. Secondary analysis revealed that this process of age-related functional reorganization was preferential as functional connectivity was observed to increase either between anatomically adjacent associative networks (DMN-DAN, FPN-DAN) or between anterior associative and posterior sensory networks (VIS-DAN, VIS-DMN, VIS-FPN, SMN-DMN, and SMN-FPN). Inherent sex differences in network segregation index were also observed. Specifically, whole-brain, associative, DMN, VAN, and FPN segregation index was greater in females compared to males, irrespective of age. Secondary analysis found that females have reduced functional connectivity between associative networks (DAN-VAN, VAN-FPN) compared to males and independent of age. A notable linear age-related decrease in FPN SI was also only observed for females and not males. The observed findings support the notion that functional networks reorganize across the adult lifespan, becoming less segregated. This decline may reflect underlying neurocognitive aging mechanisms like neural dedifferentiation, inefficiency, and compensation. The aging trajectories and rates of decreasing network segregation, however, vary across associative and sensory networks. This study also provides preliminary evidence of inherent sex differences in network organization, where associative networks are more segregated in females than males. These inherent sex differences suggest that female functional networks may be more efficient and functionally specialized compared to males across adulthood. Given these findings, future studies should take a more focused approach to examining sex differences across the lifespan, incorporating multimodal methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.