Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084354›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025

Random survival forest model in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a study based on SEER database and single center data.

Luwei Wei, Guowei Chen, Huiying Liang, Li Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luwei WeiDepartment of Gynecology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital Liuzhou 545001, Guangxi, China.
Guowei ChenDepartment of Gynecology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital Liuzhou 545001, Guangxi, China.
Huiying LiangDepartment of Gynecology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital Liuzhou 545001, Guangxi, China.
Li LiDepartment of Gynecology, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical data of 1,780 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed. A random survival forest model and a nomogram model were built based on the prognostic factors. The clinical data of 140 patients with EOC treated in Liuzhou Worker's Hospital were collected for the validation of the prognostic model. Age (≥75 years), histology grade (poor differentiation or undifferentiation), histologic types (clear cell carcinoma or carcinosarcoma), T stage (T2 or T3), M stage (M1), surgical conditions, and chemotherapy situation (without chemotherapy) were identified as independent risk factors. Based on these factors, a random forest survival prediction model was established. In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) for the random forest survival prediction model in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.848, 0.859 and 0.890, respectively. In the test set, the AUCs for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.992, 0.795 and 0.883, respectively. A nomogram prediction model was also established. In the training set, the AUCs for the nomogram prediction model for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.789, 0.803 and 0.838, respectively. In the test set, the AUCs for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.926, 0.748 and 0.836, respectively. The results indicated that the random forest survival model established in this study holds significant clinical value. Physicians can develop personalized follow-up strategies or treatment regimens for patients based on the predicted survival risk, potentially improving long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Ovarian neoplasmsprognosisrandom survival forestSEER database

Identifiers

PMID40084354
PMCPMC11897640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.