ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
Random survival forest model in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a study based on SEER database and single center data.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Liver Metastasis at Diagnosis and Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Association between endometriosis and prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical data of 1,780 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed. A random survival forest model and a nomogram model were built based on the prognostic factors. The clinical data of 140 patients with EOC treated in Liuzhou Worker's Hospital were collected for the validation of the prognostic model. Age (≥75 years), histology grade (poor differentiation or undifferentiation), histologic types (clear cell carcinoma or carcinosarcoma), T stage (T2 or T3), M stage (M1), surgical conditions, and chemotherapy situation (without chemotherapy) were identified as independent risk factors. Based on these factors, a random forest survival prediction model was established. In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) for the random forest survival prediction model in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.848, 0.859 and 0.890, respectively. In the test set, the AUCs for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.992, 0.795 and 0.883, respectively. A nomogram prediction model was also established. In the training set, the AUCs for the nomogram prediction model for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.789, 0.803 and 0.838, respectively. In the test set, the AUCs for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival were 0.926, 0.748 and 0.836, respectively. The results indicated that the random forest survival model established in this study holds significant clinical value. Physicians can develop personalized follow-up strategies or treatment regimens for patients based on the predicted survival risk, potentially improving long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.