ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025
His Bundle Pacing in the Era of Left Bundle Branch Pacing.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Left bundle branch area pacing: anatomical and physiological features made easy.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Article
- Continuous Pacing and Recording Technique: A Real-Time Feedback Approach for Left Bundle Branch Pacing.CJC open · 2025Review
- An Enhanced Method for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Extraction Using Continuous Femoral Pigtail Countertraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Apex vs. Septum Pacing: A Comprehensive Review of Pacemaker Implantation Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Determining Good Candidates for Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and Device Therapy and Which Device to Implant.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soon after the rapid growth of the popularity of His bundle pacing (HBP), the use of this conduction system pacing modality was overshadowed by left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). This focused review on HBP addresses whether there are any advantages of HBP over LBBAP and what the current uses of HBP may be. We conclude that HBP must be considered as an alternative physiological pacing method with several potential applications, undoubtedly at least as a rescue option for failed CRT/LBBAP. For wider application of HBP, prospective studies are needed to document a reduction in the incidence of late threshold rise with modern implantation techniques. Nevertheless, HBP should be available in every modern pacing laboratory. This requires an active HBP program to maintain and develop the ability of operators to deliver HBP when it is most needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.