ArticleCureus2025
Application of Surgical Adhesive Reduces Ureteroureterostomy Leakage.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Their close proximity to abdominal structures and organs places the ureters at risk of iatrogenic injury during abdominal and pelvic surgical procedures. Ureteroureterostomy is the mainstay intervention for the repair of the proximal and middle ureter. However, the anastomosis may be subject to leakage, leading to potentially serious complications, including urinary tract infection, peritonitis, sepsis, and kidney damage. This study addressed the hypothesis that topical application of surgical adhesive reduces acute anastomotic leakage without increasing ureteric resistance. Nine ureters from domestic swine were pump-perfused with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) at approximately 5, 10, 12, 15, and 20 mmHg (2 min/step), while flow and ureteral resistance were monitored, under three conditions: pre-transection, following ureteroureteral anastomosis with suture, and after topical application of Dermabond® surgical adhesive around the anastomosis circumference. Leakage was taken as the loss of fluid volume between the perfusate reservoir and the post-ureter receptacle. Values were compared by two-factor repeated measures ANOVA combined with the post hoc Tukey test. Leakage from the perfused ureter increased severalfold following transection and surgical anastomosis vs. pre-transection at all five perfusion pressures. Application of surgical adhesive to the anastomosis returned leakage to the pre-transection rate across the entire perfusion pressure range. There were no significant differences in ureteral flows and resistances among the three conditions. Thus, the application of surgical adhesive to the ureteroureteral anastomosis effectively prevented ureteric leakage at physiologic luminal pressures without increasing ureteral flow resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.