ReviewCureus2025
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertensive Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of antihypertensive therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), in managing hypertension among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. A comprehensive search adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted across five databases, identifying eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the last five years. The included studies examined diverse populations, ranging from pediatric to elderly CKD patients, with interventions tailored to specific subgroups, including those with proteinuria or diabetic kidney disease. Key outcomes assessed included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria reduction, cardiovascular events, and treatment-related adverse effects. Findings highlighted the superiority of ACEis and ARBs in reducing proteinuria and slowing CKD progression, particularly in proteinuric patients, while CCBs were effective in blood pressure control and improving cardiovascular parameters. However, no head-to-head trials directly comparing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors (ACEis/ARBs) and CCBs were identified, limiting definitive conclusions regarding their relative efficacy. Limitations such as small sample sizes and short follow-up durations were also noted in some studies. This review underscores the importance of individualized therapy based on patient-specific factors to optimize renal and cardiovascular outcomes. Further research is recommended to explore long-term outcomes and combination therapies in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.