ArticleCureus2025
Emergency Medicine Faculty Utilization of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Clinical Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact Evaluation of a Clinical Point-of-care Ultrasound Intervention in an Academic Emergency Department.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Rapid bedside multimodal ultrasound screening for acute type A aortic dissection: a perspective.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) curricula for emergency medicine residents and faculty are guided by emergency medicine societal ultrasound guidelines. These guidelines lack clinical data to support them and are mainly based on expert consensus recommendations. Data are needed to address critical gaps in the literature to identify which POCUS studies are most commonly utilized in the clinical setting to help guide guideline recommendations and POCUS curricular design. The primary aim of this study was to determine the most utilized POCUS modalities in the emergency department clinical setting. The findings of this study may be used to guide the curricular design of future POCUS trainings. Methods This was a retrospective study evaluating all clinically indicated and billed POCUS studies performed and interpreted by faculty in the emergency department setting across 10 emergency departments over a three-year period in Indianapolis, Indina, USA. The number of exams and modalities were extracted from the POCUS workflow solution. The frequency and percentage of exams were calculated. Results A total of 5,324 POCUS examinations were performed. Cardiac, obstetric, soft tissue, and focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) POCUS were the most billed modalities across all adult emergency departments regardless of academic or community setting. Although fewer data were available from the pediatric setting, we found that cardiac, soft tissue, FAST, and lung POCUS exams were the most utilized. Conclusion These data from a single healthcare system would suggest that emergency physician POCUS curricula should focus on cardiac, obstetric, soft tissue, FAST, and lung exams. More data are needed from the pediatric setting to determine which scans are most utilized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.