Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084329›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Histopathological Analysis Post Sleeve Gastrectomy: Value and Correlation With Preoperative Endoscopic Findings.

Bandar Saad Assakran, Abdulaziz S Al-Lihimy, Sarah A Alkuraydis, Aseel M Alsamaani, Ghaida S Alabdulaaly, Deema Khalid Alshaya, Ola E Alkhoshiban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bandar Saad AssakranGeneral Surgery, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraydah, SAU.
Abdulaziz S Al-LihimyGeneral Surgery, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraydah, SAU.
Sarah A AlkuraydisGeneral Surgery, Buraydah Central Hospital, Buraydah, SAU.
Aseel M AlsamaaniCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Ghaida S AlabdulaalyCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Deema Khalid AlshayaCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Ola E AlkhoshibanUnaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common bariatric surgical procedures performed today. Before LSG, patients undergo an endoscopic examination to assess for any significant pathology that could affect the surgical outcome. Following LSG, the resected stomach tissue is routinely submitted for histopathological analysis, though the practice's efficacy remains debated. Furthermore, formal guidelines and recommendations for this practice are lacking. Methodology This retrospective single-center analysis was conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH) in Buraydah, Al-Qassim. Following ethical approval, all patients with obesity who underwent LSG at our institution between 2017 and 2024 and whose medical records contained complete data were included in this study. Patient data meeting the inclusion criteria were then collected through a review of medical records. Data were collected using a standardized collection sheet. Results This study included 908 patients with obesity. Of the 908 patients, 547 (60.2%) were female and 361 (39.8%) were male. The vast majority, 893 (98.3%), were Saudi nationals. Participants had a mean age of 35.16 ± 13.049 years and a mean BMI of 44.08 ± 7.095 kg/m

Indexed as

bariatric surgeriescost-effectiveness analysishistopathological examinationpost-sleeve gastrectomypre-operative endoscopic findings

Identifiers

PMID40084329
PMCPMC11905870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.