ArticleCureus2025
Fascial Ultrasound-Guided Injection: Where Do We Really Inject?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Eleven-Point Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Hydrorelease Protocol for Non-Odontogenic Toothache and Orofacial Pain: A Clinical Protocol.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Hydrorelease Within the Paraneural Sheath: A Cadaveric Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- A Conceptual Fascial Memory Reset Hypothesis: Mechanobiological Insights into Stacking Fascia as an Ultrasound-Visible Structural Phenotype and the Potential Role of Fascial Hydrorelease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Fascial Hydrorelease for Persistent Pain After Hamstring Injury.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Ultrasonography of the Fasciae and Common Pathologies: The Game Changer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between human anatomy on ultrasonography (US) and dissection is unclear.Therefore, we investigated the precise location of a solution injected into eight legs from five fresh-frozen specimens between the fascial layers of two aponeurotic fascial (APF) regions using US.
methodsThe US-guided injection target points were the fascial lata-distal, crural fascia-proximal, and crural fascia-distal. The operator searched the optimal visualization area of two close fascial layers of the two APF regions; 2.5 mL of 0.9% saline was injected through US guidance. The layers with the solution were categorized as above the APF (between the superficial fascia and APF), intra-APF, between the APF and epimysium (EPI), or intra-muscle (under the EPI).
resultsA small amount of solution was identified within the intra-APF region, whereas a substantial amount was observed above the APF, between the APF and EPI, and intramuscularly. Regarding the fascia lata-distal and crural fascia-distal, a substantial volume of solution was observed between the APF and EPI in all cases. For the crural fascia-proximal, the solution was observed above the APF in 25% of cases and intramuscularly in 75% of cases.
conclusionsSolution distribution may be associated with whether the muscle fibers are directly inserted into the APF and the absence of EPI in each area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.