ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
Blood pressure control among Veterans with high cardiovascular disease risk.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Blood pressure (BP) control reduces risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the major cause of disability and mortality among the nine million U.S. Veterans receiving care in Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. This study examined BP control, defined as a systolic BP < 130 mmHg and diastolic BP < 80 mmHg, among U.S. Veterans with hypertension at high risk for primary or secondary CVD events. Methods: We utilized data from the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure Corporate Data Warehouse on primary care visits within the eight Great Lakes VA medical centers for Veterans with at least one visit between January 1, 2019, and February 28, 2020 and a documented visit within the 12 months prior to study initiation date. Analyses focused on Veterans with diagnosed hypertension and one or more of the following: age ≥65 years, and/or diagnosis of CVD, diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). BP control was based on the last recorded BP measurement during the study period. Results: The mean age of 83,633 Veterans with hypertension was 71.6 years (10.4) years, 96.4 % were male and race/ethnicity was reported as non-Hispanic White in 74.8 %, non-Hispanic Black or African American in 18.4 %, non-Hispanic Asian in 0.3 %, Alaskan Indian or Pacific Islander in 2.6 % and Hispanic in 2.5 %. Mean SBP and DBP based on vital signs at the last clinic visit were 130.8 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 11.6) and 73.7 mmHg (SD 8.8), respectively. Overall, BP was controlled to < 130/80 mmHg in 38.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 38.4, 39.1) and <140/90 mmHg in 76.9 % (95 % CI 76.7, 77.2). Among subgroups, BP was controlled to < 130/80 mmHg in 39.8 % (95 % CI 39.4, 40.2) of the Veterans aged ≥65 years, 45.3 % (95 % CI 44.7, 45.9) with CVD, 39.8 % (95 % CI 39.2, 40.3) with DM, 42.8 % (95 % CI 41.9, 43.6) with CKD and 47.1 % (95 % CI 45.5, 48.6) with CVD +DM +CKD. In contrast, BP control <140/90 mmHg was noted in over 75 % of Veterans within all subgroups. Conclusion: In this group of Veterans with hypertension and high risk for CVD events, less than half had BP controlled to < 130/80 mmHg. Future studies should investigate strategies to improve BP control such as team-based care with home BP monitoring, education of clinicians on hypertension management, and increased utilization of automated office BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.