ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
An Emergency Medical Services to Emergency Department Checklist for Handoff of Cardiac Arrest: A Modified Delphi Approach.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Effective communication during handoffs between emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) personnel is a critical step in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care. No handoff tool has been specifically designed for OHCA, in which timely and accurate transfer of information can substantially affect patient care. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist for OHCA handoffs based on expert consensus using a modified Delphi approach. Methods: A panel of experts from EMS and the ED were recruited to rate the importance of 17 preidentified communication items derived from video reviews of OHCA handoffs. Experts completed 2 rounds of identical surveys, followed by participation in a focus group. Participants were asked to rate the importance of each item from 1 to 10 and the timing of when items should be communicated (ie, first, second, or third part of the handoff). The focus group further refined the checklist, finalizing the key elements to be included during a 90-minute virtual session via unanimous consensus. Results: Eleven experts were approached, 10 completed surveys, and 7 participated in the focus group. The expert panel developed a 13-item checklist (patient age, location/cause of arrest, witnessed arrest, estimated downtime, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, initial rhythm, most recent rhythm, episodes of return of spontaneous circulation, defibrillation attempts, airway type, vascular access, medications administered, and code status). Witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and estimated downtime were prioritized for the first part of handoff communication. Conclusion: This study developed a concise, expert-driven checklist for OHCA handoffs to improve communication between EMS and ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.