Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084266›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025

Diagnostic Performance of Monocyte Distribution Width for the Detection of Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gregory J Eisinger, Quinn Hosler, Elliott D Crouser, Derrick D Herman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gregory J EisingerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Quinn HoslerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Elliott D CrouserDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Derrick D HermanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To aggregate literature on the diagnostic performance of monocyte distribution width (MDW) for sepsis detection among adults in the emergency department and inpatient settings. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating MDW for sepsis diagnosis in adults in the hospital setting through October 19, 2024. Two authors (G.E. and Q.H.) independently performed eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We evaluated performance for sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 separately and applied separate diagnostic thresholds depending on the anticoagulant used in blood collection. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses to evaluate the stability of our findings. Results: Twenty-five observational studies comprising 39,041 patients were included. The area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85) for both sepsis-2 and sepsis-3. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.83) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.61-0.78) for sepsis-2 and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.55-0.71) for sepsis-3. The threshold-independent weighted-average AUC was 0.76 (SD, 0.1) for sepsis-2 and 0.77 (SD, 0.07) for sepsis-3. The aggregate negative predictive value was 94% for sepsis-2 and 96% for sepsis-3. We observed similar performance across all sensitivity analyses. We assessed the overall quality of evidence to be low. Conclusions: MDW performs similarly to other biomarkers such as procalcitonin for the diagnosis of sepsis, with the unique advantage of rapid availability as part of routine testing.

Indexed as

biomarkersblood cell countdiagnostic testsmonocytessepsis

Identifiers

PMID40084266
PMCPMC11904537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.