ReviewJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Diagnostic Performance of Monocyte Distribution Width for the Detection of Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Monocyte Distribution Width for Sepsis Diagnosis in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Challenges in early detection and prognostication of sepsis: new approaches from the emergency department and intensive care unit.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Sepsis Biomarkers in Evolution: Comparative Insights and the Promising Roles of MDW and Presepsin.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The Clinical and Economic Value of Incorporating Monocyte Distribution Width Testing in the Detection of Occult Sepsis.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of monocyte distribution width to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ratio in differentiating pathogen types in community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Monocyte Distribution Width for Early Sepsis Detection in Cancer-Enriched Emergency Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To aggregate literature on the diagnostic performance of monocyte distribution width (MDW) for sepsis detection among adults in the emergency department and inpatient settings. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating MDW for sepsis diagnosis in adults in the hospital setting through October 19, 2024. Two authors (G.E. and Q.H.) independently performed eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We evaluated performance for sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 separately and applied separate diagnostic thresholds depending on the anticoagulant used in blood collection. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses to evaluate the stability of our findings. Results: Twenty-five observational studies comprising 39,041 patients were included. The area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85) for both sepsis-2 and sepsis-3. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.83) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.61-0.78) for sepsis-2 and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.55-0.71) for sepsis-3. The threshold-independent weighted-average AUC was 0.76 (SD, 0.1) for sepsis-2 and 0.77 (SD, 0.07) for sepsis-3. The aggregate negative predictive value was 94% for sepsis-2 and 96% for sepsis-3. We observed similar performance across all sensitivity analyses. We assessed the overall quality of evidence to be low. Conclusions: MDW performs similarly to other biomarkers such as procalcitonin for the diagnosis of sepsis, with the unique advantage of rapid availability as part of routine testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.