Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084235›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2025

Selecting patients with sickle cell disease for gene addition or gene editing-based therapeutic approaches: Report on behalf of a joint EHA Specialized Working Group and EBMT Hemoglobinopathies Working Party consensus conference.

Lucia de Franceschi, Franco Locatelli, David Rees, Christian Chabannon, Jean-Hugues Dalle, Stefano Rivella, Achille Iolascon, Stephan Lobitz, Miguel R Abboud, Josu de la Fuente and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Optimizing the "right" patient selection for treatment for sickle cell disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lucia de FranceschiDepartment of Engineering for Innovative Medicine University of Verona Verona Italy.
Franco LocatelliIRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome Italy.
David ReesSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences Medicine, King's College London, and Department of Haematological Medicine King's College Hospital London UK.
Christian ChabannonInstitut Paoli-Calmettes Comprehensive Cancer Center and Module Biotherapies du Centre d'Investigations Cliniques de Marseille, INSERM-Aix-Marseille Université AP-HM-IPC CBT-1409 Marseille France.
Jean-Hugues DallePediatric Hematology and Immunoloy Department, Robert-Debré Academic Hospital GHU AP-HP Nord Université Paris Cité Paris France.
Stefano RivellaDepartment of Pediatrics Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Achille IolasconDipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Naples Italy.
Stephan LobitzPediatric Hematology & Oncology, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein Koblenz Germany.
Miguel R AbboudDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon.
Josu de la FuenteDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation Centre for Haematology, Imperial College London London UK.
Pagona FlevariThalassemia Unit-Center of Expertise in Haemoglobinopathies, Laiko General Hospital Athens Greece.
Emanuele AngelucciUO Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genova Italy.
Mariane de MontalembertDepartment of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Sickle Cell Center, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Université Paris Cité Paris France.ORCID 0000-0002-4900-4753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) remains associated with reduced life expectancy and poor quality of life despite improvements observed in the last decades mostly related to comprehensive care, use of hydroxycarbamide, screening to identify patients at risk of strokes, and implementation of safe transfusion protocols. The course of the disease is highly variable, making it difficult to predict severity and response to therapy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation potentially provides a cure with a relatively low rate of complications, but few patients have an HLA-identical sibling. The hopes of patients and healthcare providers have been raised after the initial excellent results of gene therapy studies. However, there is a strong contrast between the high expectations of families and patients and the limited availability of the product, which is technically complex and very expensive. In light of this consideration and of the limited data available on the long-term efficacy and toxicity of different gene therapy approaches, the European Hematology Association Red Cell & Iron Specialized Working Group (EHA SWG) and the hemoglobinopathy working part of the European Blood & Marrow Transplant (EBMT) Group have prioritized the development of recommendations for selection of patients with SCD who are good candidates for gene therapy. The decision-making algorithm was developed by a panel of experts in hemoglobinopathies and/or transplantation chosen by EHA SWG and EBMT, to discuss the selection of SCD patients for gene therapy and draw notes on the related clinical problems.

Identifiers

PMID40084235
PMCPMC11904809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.