ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Strengthening essential emergency departments: Transforming the safety net.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician Experiences With Tele-Emergency Care: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Reengineering the Concept of Emergency Care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- An evidence-informed framework for workforce well-being and burnout prevention in emergency medicine.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- On Call or On Demand? Trends in Continuous Service Availability in California Emergency Departments, 2004-2024.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The functional landscape of critical care: a nationwide study of volume, capability, and institutional variation in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safety-net emergency departments (EDs) are a critical component of the US health care system, delivering emergency care for patients in need, including vulnerable populations. EDs provide unscheduled acute care for patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition, EDs have transformed beyond their traditional roles of providing emergency services and being the centers for regionalized trauma, cardiac, and stroke care, to also becoming stewards of public health by leading screening and treatment efforts for nonemergent conditions, such as HIV, hepatitis C, mental health, and opioid use disorder. Many safety-net hospitals and their EDs serve essential roles in urban and rural communities, making the impact of recent closures particularly concerning. In response, we convened clinical, operational, and administrative leaders of key safety-net EDs across the United States in order to develop expert consensus related to critical issues facing safety-net EDs. The goals were to help inform policymakers about current challenges and to offer timely recommendations so that together we can mend the safety net as the country works toward the goal of health equity for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.