SynthesisPeerJ2025
Effectiveness of FIFA injury prevention programs in reducing ankle injuries among football players: a systematic review.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of injury prevention programmes in female team sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hierarchical injury outcomes, training dose-response relationships, and adherence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Soccer health, performance, and injury prevention in highly trained youth soccer players: a public health approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Reporting Quality of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials on Knee and Ankle Injury Prevention Programs in Football Players Using PRISMA 2020.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Analysis of Sports Injury Prevalence and Patterns in Recreational Sports Activities in South Korea: Applying the Association Rule Method.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankle injuries are some of the most common injuries among footballers and can prevent players from participating in sport. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) developed FIFA injury prevention programs to reduce overall football injuries, but their effectiveness on a particular joint, such as the ankle, was not assessed. Therefore, this project aims to investigate if these FIFA injury prevention programs are particularly effective in reducing ankle injuries. Method: A systematic review was conducted with the following criteria for study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RTCs) comparing the FIFA programs (FIFA 11 the old version and FIFA 11+) with the usual training for the teams. Other studies that included the number or percentage of ankle injuries as an outcome. Sample: Male and female footballers aged between 13 and 40 years old and without any restriction on particular skill levels. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: The search strategy identified five RCTs that used the FIFA programs. The included studies had a good-to-excellent methodological quality according to the PEDro scale (ranging from 5 to 7 out of 10). The pooled data from all the included studies indicated that the FIFA 11 and FIFA 11+ programs were effective in reducing the ankle injury rate by 14%, while pooled results from the studies that used the FIFA 11+ program significantly reduced ankle injury rate by 32%. However, the FIFA 11 program was not effective in reducing the ankle injury rate. Conclusion: The FIFA programs, and especially the FIFA 11+ program, appear to be more effective than the usual training in preventing ankle injuries among footballers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.