ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
A framework for upskilling the clinical trial site: Learnings from a clinical trial coordinator workforce capability building pilot program.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation science and the clinical trial workforce: A national needs assessment of training and practice.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This paper describes a simple education model for health service organisations engaging in clinical trials. Clinical trial coordinators (CTCs) are essential to operations of the clinical trial workforce; however, there is significant disparity in their skills and knowledge. The TrialHub upskilling pilot program is a novel, multimodal upskilling initiative which aims to develop an innovative clinical trial education framework to build consistent standards across the workforce, irrespective of site location and maturity. Method: The upskilling pilot program was implemented across 7 health service organisations with varying levels of clinical trial maturity. The program adopted a stepwise engagement approach, and incorporated elements including mentorship, in-house training program strategies, and ongoing professional development initiatives. This approach was guided by consultation at individual CTC level to health service organisation governance levels, enabling education programs driven by CTC needs and oversight strategies for upskilling standards at each site. Site activity engagement sessions were tracked to map the progress of upskilling element implementation, and informed on framework development. Results: Over a 30-month period (January 2022 to June 2024) site engagement tracking indicated diverse needs at each site, aligned with varying levels of site maturity and evolving upskilling priorities and focus throughout the pilot period. These insights underscore a requirement for tailoring upskilling elements and education initiatives to sites' specific circumstances and changing maturity during development. Subsequently an upskilling framework, informed by these program learnings, was established to guide future workforce development and growth needs. Conclusion: Although limited by a small sample size, this pilot program has demonstrated the potential of a tailored multi-modal upskilling approach to provide valuable professional learning experiences in clinical trial coordination, and support clinical trial site capability development. Clinical trial sites adoption of upskilling programs requires harmonisation and structured support through adaptive implementation, as described by the CTC upskilling framework. Upskilling CTCs in parallel with increasing clinical trial site capability is required if sites are to be adequately mature, and be able to meet the growing demands of Australian communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.