ArticleBiomarker insights2025
[
Article in Biomarker insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salvage radiotherapy with prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed focal boost: A precision approach for recurrent prostate cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Treatment of biochemical recurrence after primary therapy with curative intent.Current opinion in urology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy often present with very low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (⩽0.5 ng/mL). Accurate detection of recurrence at such low levels is crucial for guiding treatment decisions. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of [ Design: A prospective study conducted between May 2021 and January 2023, with data subsequently analyzed retrospectively after a 2-year follow-up. Methods: The cohort comprised 157 PCa patients with BCR, of whom 52 had PSA levels ⩽ 0.5 ng/mL and underwent PSMA-PETMR imaging. The imaging protocol incorporated multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PET acquisitions, with lesion classification following PSMA-RADS version 1.0. Detection rates of recurrent lesions, including local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and skeletal metastasis, were evaluated. Results: PSMA-PETMR exhibited a 63.5% detection rate for recurrent PCa at low PSA levels, surpassing traditional diagnostic methods. Thirty-four local recurrences, 12 metastatic lymph nodes, and 4 skeletal metastases were identified. Follow-up imaging enhanced the detection rate to 73.1% by reclassifying initially equivocal findings. PSMA-PETMR influenced clinical decision-making in 17% of patients by facilitating personalized treatment strategies. Conclusion: PSMA-PETMR significantly improves the detection of recurrent PCa in patients with very low PSA levels, offering precise lesion localization and supporting personalized treatment approaches. Further studies are needed to optimize its clinical use and validate its long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.