ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Does the occurence of homostyly necessarily accompany the breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility system?
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heterostyly is a genetic polymorphism that facilitates precise pollen transfer through reciprocal herkogamy. The loss or variation of reciprocal herkogamy is usually accompanied by the breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility system. Homostyly, which is characterized by self-compatibility and same stigma-anther height is a common floral morph in the variation and evolution of heterostyly. Methods: The floral morphs composition and frequency, heterostylous syndrome, pollinators and visiting efficiency were investigated in five natural populations of Results and conclusion: All populations were composed of L-, S- and H-morphs, except for ATS population with only H-morph, and there were significant differences in flower size parameter, fruit set, and degree of pollination limitation, while no differences among morphs within population. However, each population demonstrated dimorphic pollen-stigma morphology and a strict heteromorphic incompatibility system, especially ATS population, in which they were compatible between morphs with heteromorphic pollen-stigma morphology, regardless of the reciprocal herkogamy, and vice versa. It is speculated that the H-morph in different populations may be at different stages of heterostylous evolution. The ATS population may be a dimorphic population without reciprocal herkogamy which is in the stage before distyly formation, while the other 4 populations may be dimorphic populations with significant variation in reciprocal herkogamy which is in the stage after distyly formation. The H-morph may be caused by stigma-anther separation shortening of L- and S-morph in other 4 populations. These phenomenons that the variation of floral morph is independent of physiological incompatibility breakdown, as well as the coexistence of populations from different origins and evolutionary stages within the same species have been reported for the first time in the Plumbaginaceae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.