Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40084081›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Microbial Biofilm Detection and Differentiation by Dual Staining Using Maneval's Stain.

B Nirmala, Balram Ji Omar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B NirmalaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Balram Ji OmarDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial biofilms are structured communities of microorganisms embedded in a self-produced extracellular matrix, adhering to surfaces. These biofilms enhance bacterial resistance to antibiotics, immune responses, and environmental stress. Current microscopy techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and fluorescence microscopy, are commonly used to visualize and differentiate biofilms. However, their high cost and complexity often render them impractical. In contrast, simpler methods like crystal violet and Congo red staining are limited in distinguishing bacterial cells from the biofilm matrix. This study introduces a cost-effective, dual-staining method using Maneval's stain to visualize and differentiate microbial biofilms. It requires only basic equipment and minimal reagents, making it ideal for routine use in clinical diagnosis and microbial research. Key features • This dual-staining method differentiates bacterial cells, biofilm matrix, and capsules in a single stain. • This method applies to both bacterial and fungal biofilm. • This method requires no specialized training or equipment, with the entire process completed within 30-45 min. • Stained slides can be stored for extended periods (months) without degradation.

Indexed as

Bacterial biofilmBiofilm detectionDual stainingFungal biofilmManeval’s stainMicrobial capsule

Identifiers

PMID40084081
PMCPMC11896776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.