ArticleBio-protocol2025
Annotated Bioinformatic Pipelines for Phylogenomic Placement of Mitochondrial Genomes.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The limited standards for the rigorous and objective use of mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) can lead to uncertainties regarding the phylogenetic relationships of taxa under varying evolutionary constraints. The mitogenome exhibits heterogeneity in base composition, and evolutionary rates may vary across different regions, which can cause empirical data to violate assumptions of the applied evolutionary models. Consequently, the unique evolutionary signatures of the dataset must be carefully evaluated before selecting an appropriate approach for phylogenomic inference. Here, we present the bioinformatic pipeline and code used to expand the mitogenome phylogeny of the order Carcharhiniformes (groundsharks), with a focus on houndsharks (Chondrichthyes: Triakidae). We present a rigorous approach for addressing difficult-to-resolve phylogenies, incorporating multi-species coalescent modelling (MSCM) to address gene/species tree discordance. The protocol describes carefully designed approaches for preparing alignments, partitioning datasets, assigning models of evolution, inferring phylogenies based on traditional site-homogenous concatenation approaches as well as under multispecies coalescent and site heterogenous models, and generating statistical data for comparison of different topological outcomes. The datasets required to run our analyses are available on GitHub and Dryad repositories. Key features • An extensive statistical framework to conduct model selection and data partitioning and tackle difficult-to-resolve phylogenies. • Instructions for generating statistical data for comparison of different topological outcomes. • Tips for selecting mitochondrial phylogenomic (mitophylogenomic) approaches to suit unique datasets. • Access to the scripts, data files, and pipelines used to enable replication of all analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.