ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
Prognostic value of admission base excess in postoperative outcomes of aortic dissection patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between admission base excess and clinical outcomes in postoperative patients with aortic dissection. Methods: Clinical data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV) database. The association between admission base excess and mortality in postoperative patients with aortic dissection was assessed using multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Subgroup analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of base excess for in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. Results: A total of 196 patients were categorized into the normal base excess (-3 to +3 mmol/L) group and abnormal base excess (<-3 or >+3 mmol/L) group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that arterial base excess was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality across all periods. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interaction effects. The area under the ROC curve for base excess ranged from 0.640 to 0.745, indicating comparable predictive performance to existing scoring tools. Conclusion: Arterial base excess measured at admission is an effective and accessible predictor of mortality in patients with aortic dissection following surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.