ReviewChemical science2025
Bimetallic effects in carbon dioxide electroreduction.
Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrocatalytic COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Electrocatalytic Oxyanion Reduction: From Fundamental Principles to Rational Catalyst Design.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2026Review
- Recent advances in nanoalloys for selective electrochemical CONanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Science-Towards-Technology Breakthrough in COAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- A Machine Learning-Guided Search of Cu-Based Bimetallic Alloys That Favor CO Dimerization in COChemSusChem · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a clean and sustainable technology, electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction reaction (ECO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.