ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association between dietary oxidative balance score and constipation: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Numerous researches have revealed a correlation between dietary factors and the development of constipation. This study aimed to investigate the association between dietary oxidative balance score (DOBS) and constipation. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by us based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2010 including 31,034 individuals who completed a constipation questionnaire. The DOBS was calculated based on 16 dietary factors, containing 14 antioxidants and two prooxidants. Multiple logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were employed to examine the correlation between DOBS and constipation. Meanwhile, propensity score matching (PSM) was chosen to eliminate the effect of confounding variables. Results: A total of 11,019 participants were identified as constipation. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that decreasing DOBS (OR = 0.977, 95% CI: 0.966-0.987, Conclusion: Low levels of DOBS were positively associated with the risk of constipation development, demonstrating that DOBS could be employed as a dietary indicator of constipation prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.