ArticleBiofilm2025
A simulated microgravity biofilm reactor with integrated microfabricated sensors: Advancing biofilm studies in near-space conditions.
Article in Biofilm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studying biofilms in a microgravity environment currently relies on one of two scenarios, collecting planktonic aggregates in rotating wall vessels or performing experiments in the microgravity environment of space on the International Space Station. While informative techniques, both have their limitations when studying surface-attached microbial communities. A simulated microgravity biofilm reactor (SMBR) was developed to study biofilms in microgravity, coupled with the integration of microfabricated sensors for internal system monitoring. The establishment of simulated microgravity was demonstrated through computational fluid dynamic modelling revealing low fluid shear stress conditions (<1 mPa) throughout the reactor and on the wall surface. Microfabricated resistance temperature devices integrated in the reactor walls confirmed the capability for continuous sensor measurements during operation with the ability to perform traditional microbiology analyses on the sensor surface following an experiment. Microbiological analyses established that there were no significant differences in biofilm growth between sensor and wall surfaces within the reactor. With the integration of defined sampling surfaces, the SMBR allows for in-depth biofilm analysis in a repeatable and accessible manner allowing for a greater understanding of the effects of microgravity on biofilm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.