Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083770›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

The expanding role of next-generation imaging in prostate cancer management: a cross-sectional survey exploring the clinical practice of uro-oncologists in North-Eastern Italy; on behalf of GUONE (Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est).

Fabio Matrone, Luca Urso, Rossano Girometti, Jerry Polesel, Matteo Sepulcri, Francesco Pierantoni, Paolo Artioli, Anna Caliò, Irene Campo, Alessia Cimadamore and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Fabio MatroneRadiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, via F. Gallini 2, Aviano 33081, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-0444
Luca UrsoDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Rossano GiromettiIstituto di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Medicina (DMED), Università di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Jerry PoleselCancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Matteo SepulcriRadiation Therapy Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Francesco PierantoniOncology Unit 3, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Paolo ArtioliUOC Medicina Nucleare, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy.
Anna CaliòDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-6327
Irene CampoRadiology Unit, SC Radiologia Gorizia-Monfalcone, Monfalcone, Italy.
Alessia CimadamoreInstitute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Enrico MunariDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.
Luca OngaroUrological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5649-4095
Valentina OrlandoOncology Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Trieste, Italy.
Camilla SachsDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Ca' Foncello, Treviso, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8855-4662
Alessandro VecciaUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro AntonelliUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Roberto BortolusRadiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Orazio CaffoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Laura EvangelistaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Matteo SalgarelloNuclear Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria IRCCS, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Umberto BassoOncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Rocco De VivoDepartment of Oncology, Ospedale San Bartolo, Vicenza, Italy.
Mario GardiUrology Clinic, Azienda Ospedale Universitaria di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Andrea GuttillaUrology Clinic, Camposampiero Hospital, Camposampiero, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6609-7402
Marco Andrea SignorRadiation Therapy Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Fabio ZattoniUrology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Filippo AlongiAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria IRCCS, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Giampaolo MontesiRadiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Gianluca GiannariniUrology Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-246X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Next-generation imaging (NGI) technologies such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and total-body NGI (tbNGI) methodologies including choline, fluciclovine or PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), whole-body MRI (wbMRI), and PET/MRI are becoming increasingly available, but their use in different prostate cancer (PCa) settings is under debate. The Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est (GUONE) designed a survey to explore the current clinical practice of NGI utilization in a specific macro-region in North-Eastern Italy. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by administering an anonymous online multiple-choice questionnaire to uro-oncologists practicing in North-Eastern Italy, using the Google Forms Results: In all, 100 uro-oncologists accessed and completed the survey. In primary N/M staging, the use of tbNGI increases in accordance with NCCN risk groups. Re-staging with choline and PSMA PET/CT is the prevalent choice in the case of BCR after radical prostatectomy. Moreover, when the PSA value rises, there is a parallel increased use of tbNGI. When an LR is suspected, PSMA PET/CT plus mpMRI is the most selected option. Re-staging with tbNGI (PSMA PET/CT) is preferred in mHSPC, mCRPC, and nmCRPC patients in case of progression of disease. Overall, there is a limited use of wbMRI and PET/MRI in all the settings investigated. Conclusion: Our survey describes the expanding role of NGI modalities in the management of PCa patients, from primary staging and re-staging to management of advanced PCa and assessment of treatment response. Several controversial issues have emerged, which need to be addressed in prospective studies to develop a standardized and cost-effective NGI utilization.

Indexed as

mpMRIPET/MRIprostate cancerPSMA PET/CTwhole-body MRI

Identifiers

PMID40083770
PMCPMC11905040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.