Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083661›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Roles for the 3D genome in the cell cycle, DNA replication, and double strand break repair.

Katherine A Giles, Phillippa C Taberlay, Anthony J Cesare, Mathew J K Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Polymorphic 3D genome architecture mediated by transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine A GilesChildren's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Phillippa C TaberlayMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Anthony J CesareChildren's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Mathew J K JonesFaculty of Medicine, Frazer Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large eukaryotic genomes are packaged into the restricted area of the nucleus to protect the genetic code and provide a dedicated environment to read, copy and repair DNA. The physical organisation of the genome into chromatin loops and self-interacting domains provides the basic structural units of genome architecture. These structural arrangements are complex, multi-layered, and highly dynamic and influence how different regions of the genome interact. The role of chromatin structures during transcription via enhancer-promoter interactions is well established. Less understood is how nuclear architecture influences the plethora of chromatin transactions during DNA replication and repair. In this review, we discuss how genome architecture is regulated during the cell cycle to influence the positioning of replication origins and the coordination of DNA double strand break repair. The role of genome architecture in these cellular processes highlights its critical involvement in preserving genome integrity and cancer prevention.

Indexed as

3D genome architecturecell cyclechromatinchromatin organisationDNA damageDNA repairreplicationTADs

Identifiers

PMID40083661
PMCPMC11903485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.