ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Machine and deep learning to predict viral fusion peptides.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- C-Terminal Nucleobase Modification Amplifies Peptide-Mediated Liposome Fusion.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights and emerging applications of human metapneumovirus (HMPV) treatment: From molecular design to translational immunity.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- A unified model of transient poration induced by antimicrobial peptides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral fusion proteins, located on the surface of enveloped viruses like SARS-CoV-2, Influenza, and HIV, play a vital role in fusing the virus envelope with the host cell membrane. Fusion peptides, conserved segments within these proteins, are crucial for the fusion process and are potential targets for therapy. Experimental identification of fusion peptides is time-consuming and costly, which creates the need for bioinformatics tools that can predict the segment within the fusion protein sequence that corresponds to the FP. Although homology-based methods have been used towards this end, they fail to identify fusion peptides lacking overall sequence similarity to known counterparts. Therefore, alternative methods are needed to discover new putative fusion peptides, namely those based on machine learning. In this study, we explore various ML-based approaches to identify fusion peptides within a fusion protein sequence. We employ token classification methods and sliding window approaches coupled with machine and deep learning models. We evaluate different protein sequence representations, including one-hot encoding, physicochemical features, as well as representations from Natural Language Processing, such as word embeddings and transformers. Through the examination of over 50 combinations of models and features, we achieve promising results, particularly with models based on a state-of-the-art transformer for amino acid token classification. Furthermore, we utilize the best models to predict hypothetical fusion peptides for SARS-CoV-2, and critically analyse annotated peptides from existing research. Overall, our models effectively predict the location of fusion peptides, even in viruses for which limited experimental data is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.