Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083595›Full record

ArticleClinical hypertension2025

Posttreatment pulse rate reduction and not baseline pulse rate as an indicator of blood pressure response to nebivolol: a subanalysis from the real-world BENEFIT-KOREA study.

Jinho Shin, Dong Hoon Cha, Woo-Hyung Bae, In Hyun Jung, Seung-Pyo Hong, Sang-Hyun Kim, Jun-Young Do, Won Min Hwang, Young Youp Koh, Giuseppe Mancia and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03847350 (An Observational Study to Identify BEnefits After 24 Weeks of NEBILET®), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03847350 completednot on this map

An Observational Study to Identify BEnefits After 24 Weeks of NEBILET®(Nebivolol) Administration For Essential hypertensIon Patients With Various Co-morbidities and Treatment Environments in KOREA.

TypeobservationalSponsorA.Menarini Asia-Pacific Holdings Pte LtdRan2015 to 2017Enrolled3,250ConditionsEssential Hypertension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinho ShinDepartment of Cardiology, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hoon ChaDepartment of Cardiology, CHA University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Hyung BaeDepartment of Cardiology, BongSeng Memorial Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
In Hyun JungDepartment of Cardiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Pyo HongDepartment of Cardiology, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Hyun KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young DoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Won Min HwangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Young Youp KohDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Giuseppe ManciaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano-Bicocca, Milan and Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy.
Athanasios J ManolisDepartment of Cardiology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
MinYoung LeeMedical Affairs, A. Menarini Korea Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This subanalysis of BENEFIT-KOREA cohort assessed the impact of baseline pulse rate (PR) and posttreatment PR reduction on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension. Methods: South Korean patients with hypertension were enrolled in the BENEFIT-KOREA study; 3,011 patients received nebivolol as monotherapy/add-on therapy. Time-averaged BP, calculated by sum of the product of BPs at weeks 12 and 24 corrected for number of participants at these timepoints, was evaluated with/without adjustment for baseline BP. Change in BP in baseline PR groups of < 70, 70-79, and ≥ 80 beats/min and posttreatment PR reduction groups of < 1, 1-9, and ≥ 10 beats/min at 24 weeks were evaluated. Results: The unadjusted time-averaged systolic BP (SBP) at 24 weeks was not significantly different within baseline PR groups or posttreatment PR reduction groups, but the unadjusted time-averaged diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly different within both baseline PR ( Conclusions: The efficacy of nebivolol for BP reduction seems to be indicated not by baseline PR but by posttreatment PR reduction. These findings suggest the presence of other mechanisms in addition to sympathetic inhibition which potentially weaken the relationship between baseline PR and BP reduction. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03847350.

Indexed as

Blood pressureEssential hypertensionHeart rateNebivolol

Identifiers

PMID40083595
PMCPMC11903211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.