ArticleCureus2025
Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA): An Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework for Bioethical Clinical Decision Support.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of agentic artificial intelligence in healthcare: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The Emergence of Applied Artificial Intelligence in the Realm of Value Based Musculoskeletal Care.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare professionals face complex ethical dilemmas in clinical settings in cases involving end-of-life care, informed consent, and surrogate decision-making. These nuanced situations often lead to moral distress among care providers. This paper introduces the Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA) framework, a novel and innovative approach that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to support clinical ethical decision-making. The BAIA framework integrates multiple bioethical approaches, including principlism, casuistry, and narrative ethics, with advanced AI capabilities to provide comprehensive decision support. The framework employs a structured methodology that includes data collection, paradigmatic case review, analysis through "mattering maps," and scenario-based decision reasoning. A detailed analysis of two challenging cases, an end-of-life care decision and a complex conjoined twins case, demonstrates BAIA's potential to harmonize diverse ethical perspectives while reducing the moral burden on healthcare providers. The framework's agentic architecture additionally allows integration with any new and existing ethical AI systems like METHAD, Delphi, and EAIFT, enabling multiframework collaboration. This work also acknowledges limitations related to data quality, bias, and complexity of ethical decisions and proposes mitigation strategies, including standardized databases, fairness algorithms, and maintaining human oversight. Thus, this work represents a significant step toward combining technological advancement in agentic AI with established bioethical principles to improve the quality and consistency of clinical ethical decision-making, thus reducing moral distress for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.