ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Disitamab vedotin
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Treatment NLR and SII Associations with Response and Progression-Free Survival After Neoadjuvant Disitamab Vedotin Plus PD-1 Blockade in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A comparison of efficacy and prognosis between RC48 combined immunotherapy and gemcitabine-cisplatin combined immunotherapy in bladder-preserving multimodal therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Toripalimab plus disitamab vedotin versus tislelizumab-based combination in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a real-world comparative study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate in bladder urothelial carcinoma: a case report.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Choosing neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer based on efficacy-safety trade-off: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Adjuvant disitamab vedotin plus PD-1 blockade and gemcitabine/cisplatin in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a two-stage real-world comparative study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- The clinical landscape of bladder cancer treatment: a brief report on new developments and future perspectives in pharmaceutical interventions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world evaluation of the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (RC48) in urothelial carcinoma.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Development of a radiomics and clinical feature-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of pathological grade in bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus programmed cell death protein-1 blockade versus chemoradiotherapy alone for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a real-world comparative study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive bladder cancer characterized by invasion of the muscular bladder wall, often necessitating a multimodal treatment approach for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (RC48), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), combined immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), against the gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) regimen with PD-1 immunotherapy in the treatment of MIBC. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and included 38 patients with MIBC treated with either RC48 plus immunotherapy or GC regimen plus immunotherapy, between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the RC48 with immunotherapy (ADC + PD-1) group and the GC regimen with immunotherapy (GC + PD-1) group. Efficacy was evaluated based on their pathological complete response rates (PCRR) and pathological downstaging rates (PDR). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed to compare safety profiles. Results: Of the 38 patients, 17 were in the ADC + PD-1 group and 21 were in the GC + PD-1 group. The PCRR was significantly higher in the ADC + PD-1 group (82.35%, 14/17) compared to the GC + PD-1 group (47.62%, 10/21; Conclusion: RC48 combined with immunotherapy demonstrated a significantly higher PCRR compared to the GC regimen with immunotherapy, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. These findings highlight the potential of RC48 combined with immunotherapy as an effective treatment option for MIBC in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.