ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Machine learning for predicting the prognosis of patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic therapy for advanced thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review of current evidence and perspectives.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- Advancing prognostic and therapeutic prediction in lung squamous cell carcinoma through integrated multi-omics analysis and 117 machine learning combinations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Precision Risk Stratification in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Relevance of CatBoost-based Prediction Following TACE.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thymoma and thymic carcinoma are the most common tumors of the anterior mediastinum. However, there are little research on applying machine learning (ML) approaches to the prognostic prediction of thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The study aims to develop predictive models utilizing ML techniques to accurately forecast the 5-year survival of patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Methods: Patients with malignant thymic neoplasms were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 database, and their demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were collected. ML classifiers, including elastic net regularized logistic regression, random forest (RF), non-linear support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine, and categorical boosting (CatBoost) were trained. The hyper-parameter of the algorithms was optimized by a grid search with five repeats of 10-fold cross-validation. Ensemble models were built based on the three algorithms with the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) in the validation set. The best model among the single models and ensemble model was selected as the final model. Calibration curve and decision curve were adopted to evaluate the calibration performance and clinical utility. For comparison, we constructed a baseline model consisting of age and Masaoka stages using logistic regression. Results: After data cleaning, 1,363 patients and 841 patients were included in the overall survival (OS) dataset and disease-specific survival (DSS) dataset, respectively. CatBoost [AUC: 0.755; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.698-0.811] had the best performance in the OS prediction for the original dataset. The ensemble model achieved the highest prognostic efficiency for the original dataset, with an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.765-0.901). Calibration showed favorable goodness of fit and was further verified with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (CatBoost: χ Conclusions: We trained ML-based predictive models that could accurately predict the 5-year OS and DSS of patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.