ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Accuracy of lung structure constructed by three-dimensional image analysis with non-enhanced computed tomography.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are few papers on three-dimensional (3D) images of the lungs using non-enhanced computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of 3D images of the lungs using non-enhanced CT. Methods: The study included 10 consecutive cases for each lung lobe, totalling 50 cases between March and December 2022. The patients had both non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CT taken within 2 months before surgery. A 3D image analysis system (SYNAPSE VINCENT) was used to obtain 3D images of the pulmonary artery (PA), pulmonary vein (PV), and bronchus (Br). The system automatically generated 3D images based on both non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CTs, which were then compared with each other and also with actual surgical findings. Results: The coincidence rate of PA, PV, and Br between 3D images based on non-enhanced CT and enhanced CT was 70% for the right lung and 65% for the left lung. The coincidence rate of PA, PV, and Br between 3D images based on non-enhanced CT and actual surgical findings was 100% for the right middle, right lower, and left lower lobes, but 50% for the right upper lobe and 60% for the left upper lobe. Conclusions: The 3D images of the lungs based on non-enhanced CT showed that the right middle lobe and both lower lobes were correctly depicted. The right and left upper lobes were poorly visualized using non-enhanced CT, while the right upper lobe was poorly visualized using contrast-enhanced CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.