Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083525›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025

Assessments and exercises of cough strength in critically ill patients: a literature review.

Shi-Min Zhang, Yaxiaerjiang Muhetaer, Kai Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shi-Min Zhang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yaxiaerjiang Muhetaer *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Airway clearance is essential for maintaining patency in critically ill patients and relies on the mucociliary escalator, expiratory flow, and cough strength. A weak cough significantly increases the risk of therapy failure in patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). This review aims to summarize current practices for assessing and exercising cough strength in critically ill patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect using specific keywords related to cough assessment and exercises. A total of 281 articles on cough assessment and 1,407 on cough exercises were identified, with 26 and 73 studies included in the review, respectively. Key Content and Findings: By collecting literature related to cough efficacy, this narrative review describes methods for assessing cough ability and strategies for improving it. The assessment methods for cough ability include quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative evaluations, each targeting different populations and having its own advantages and disadvantages. For patients whose cough ability has diminished, it is essential to implement cough training. Cough exercises focus on increasing inhaled volume, enhancing expiratory flow, and utilizing oscillation techniques to improve cough effectiveness. Choosing the appropriate training method for the patients can lead to significantly better outcomes. Conclusions: Weak cough in critically ill patients correlates with increased risks of extubation failure and prolonged hospitalization. Employing appropriate assessment methods and individualized cough exercises is critical for improving patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Further research is needed to optimize training methods and enhance patient cooperation.

Indexed as

cough peak flow (CPF)Cough strengthexercisespeak expiratory flow (PEF)semiquantitative cough strength score (SCSS)

Identifiers

PMID40083525
PMCPMC11898338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.