ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Survival advantage of radiotherapy and nomogram for patients with pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: a propensity score-matched Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a SEER-based prediction model for survival in poorly and undifferentiated colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The standard treatment for pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) is surgery in the early stage and is generally determined according to the histologic type and stage. Radiotherapy (RT) is a treatment option for locally advanced or unresectable lung cancers. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of RT in patients with pNENs using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Methods: We used propensity score matching analysis to balance differences in variables between the RT and no-RT groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to evaluate the factors related to overall survival and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A novel nomogram was constructed, and the results were evaluated using the concordance index. Results: A total of 7,470 cases were identified between 2000 and 2019, among whom 1,429 were placed in the RT group and propensity-score matched with those in the no-RT group at a 1:1 ratio. Age, sex, marital status, disease extension, surgery, and RT were identified as independent prognostic factors of outcome. There was no significant difference in overall or CSS between RT and no-RT patients in the surgery group (P=0.22 and P=0.72, respectively). However, RT was associated with survival benefit in the no-surgery group. According to the concordance index, the nomogram could accurately predict the prognosis of patients with pNENs. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that RT may provide a survival benefit for patients with pNENs, particularly for those who did not undergo surgery. The nomogram produced in this study may be a used to predict the prognosis of this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.