ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound elastography for detecting benign and malignant lymph nodes: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Updates on Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Its Clinical Implications.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Review
- Integrative use of conventional mode and elastography in endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of malignant intrathoracic lymphadenopathy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) elastography is a diagnostic tool used for measuring the elasticity of intrathoracic lesions. It is still essential for discussions about how accurate elastography is at identifying benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic utility of EBUS elastography and to determine the variables affecting this procedure. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study involving patients with suspected lung cancer who underwent EBUS elastography followed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between October 2021 and March 2023. The pathological results of EBUS-TBNA, validated through a six-month follow-up, served as the gold standard. Each lymph node had its ultrasonic elastography indices recorded, including the elastography grading score, blue color ratio (BCR), blue color score, and short axis diameter. The diagnostic efficacy of elastography was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which differentiated between benign and malignant lymph nodes. To investigate the factors impacting the elastography indices, multivariate logistic regression was used with multiple serological markers, lymph node location, and pathology. Results: Of the 168 patients, 322 lymph nodes were punctured, with 175 (54.3%) being malignant. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the combined index of elastography grading score and short-axis diameter was 0.702 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.645-0.759]. While the pathology of the lymph nodes was found to influence the BCR, BCR was unable to distinguish between lymph nodes with benign conditions and those with small cell carcinoma. Conclusions: The use of elastography data alone may be inadequate for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes. However, elastography can provide supplementary diagnostic information during EBUS-TBNA. Invasive EBUS-TBNA remains recommended as it aids in the identification of malignant lymph nodes when used in conjunction with pathological, radiological, and clinical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.