ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Safety and outcomes of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves under moderate sedation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) offers a minimally invasive treatment for severe emphysema. Traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA), this study evaluates whether BLVR performed under moderate sedation (MS) potentially has less adverse events as compared to ones done under GA. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 65 patients who underwent BLVR with EBV placement at the University of Florida between January 2020 and June 2022. All procedures were performed under MS. Primary outcomes assessed included the incidence of pneumothorax (PTX), while secondary outcomes comprised valve removal rates, need for revision bronchoscopy, and other procedural complications. Results: The incidence of PTX was 16.9%, lower than the previously reported rate of 26% in studies combining GA and MS. No major complications or deaths were reported. Procedures were successfully completed in all patients, with valves deployed as planned. Revision bronchoscopy was required in 21.5% of cases. Conclusions: BLVR under MS is demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with a lower rate of complications compared to GA. These findings suggest that MS may be a preferred sedation method for BLVR, though further research is warranted to confirm these results and explore the long-term outcomes and cost implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.