ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Thoracic autonomic nervous system surgery current application-a survey among members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic autonomic nervous system surgery is mainly used for hyperhidrosis/facial flushing, whereas cardiac and vascular indications are limited. The literature remains controversial regarding the correct indications and surgical technique, with the lack of homogeneous data being a major limitation. We designed a survey to investigate current practice among members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Methods: A 29-question ad hoc questionnaire was available to all ESTS members from December 2022 to February 2023. It included questions on demographics, indications, preoperative evaluation, technique, complications and follow-up. A descriptive analysis of the data is presented. Results: The response rate was 7% and 121 of 123 valid responses were analysed. Sympathetic surgery was performed for hyperhidrosis/facial flushing, cardiac and vascular disease in 99%, 29% and 29% of respondents respectively. Palmar hyperhidrosis was the most common, followed by axillary, facial flushing and craniofacial hyperhidrosis. Catecholaminergic ventricular tachycardia was more common than long QT syndrome and Raynaud's over Buerger's disease. Data analysis showed that members preferred nerve cutting to clipping (66%, 64% and 58% for hyperhidrosis/facial flushing, cardiac and vascular disease respectively). Preference for the target level of nerve block varied significantly depending on the condition addressed. For most responders (65%), severe compensatory sweating was an adverse event, occurring in less than 10% of treated cases. Only 52% used a database for follow-up. Conclusions: Current practice in sympathetic surgery in ESTS responders is consistent with the available evidence, although it is characterized by great heterogeneity in almost all aspects. A database could help to standardize patient selection, surgical techniques and follow-up, and provide the basis for future multi-institutional trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.