ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Artificial intelligence assisted identification of newborn auricular deformities via smartphone application.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Auricular deformities are common in newborns and require early diagnosis and timely intervention. Several factors highlight the necessity of a machine learning-based diagnostic solution: the high prevalence of these conditions, the narrow time window for effective non-surgical treatment, limited medical resources, and the importance of both physical and mental well-being. This study presents a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify and classify common sub-types of auricle deformities, using photos taken with mobile devices. Methods: The dataset was made up of the open-source dataset named BabyEar4k, which contains 3852 auricle images with diagnosis data, and another private dataset containing 104 microtia ears added from ENT Hospital of Fudan University. All the training photos were pre-processed to 800 × 800 RGB images, with the auricles located at the centers. The dataset was divided into two parts, 3835 samples for training/validation and 120 (20 for each class) for testing, i.e., the internal test dataset. 15% of the training data were used for validation during the training process. External validation was conducted on data from three centres across China (Xinjiang N = 252, Guizhou N = 186, and Fujian N = 252). The performance of the model was evaluated by comparative analyses with human volunteers. A prospective test set was collected in Shanghai (Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, from 2023/10/17 to 2023/12/29; N = 272). Given the significant variation in the distribution of sub-types, accuracy and weighted F1-score were chosen as primary evaluation metrics. Findings: Four different backbone architectures were evaluated: ResNet50, DenseNet121, EfficientNet, and RegNet. On the internal test set, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.83-0.85 for six-class classification and 0.94-0.98 for binary classification. ResNet50 backbone had the most consistent performance. Multi-center real-world data validation demonstrated satisfactory accuracy, with a range of 0.74-0.82 for six-class classification and 0.79-0.86 for normal/abnormal classification, indicating strong generalizability. In comparative analyses with volunteers, the professionals achieved an accuracy of 0.7-0.8 in the six-class classification task, while the related fellows scored 0.45-0.65, and the laypeople scored 0.45-0.55. Interpretation: The developed system offers an efficient and cost-effective solution for clinical applications, including early diagnosis of newborn auricular deformities, monitoring treatment progress, and educational purposes. Funding: This study was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan (23Y21900200, 21DZ2200700, T-Y Zhang) and Medical Engineering Fund of Fudan University (Y-Y Fu). S Wang was supported by the Shanghai Sailing Program (22YF1409300) and China Computer Federation (CCF)-Baidu Open Fund Grant (CCF-BAIDU 202316).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.