ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Evaluation of the etiology of epilepsy and/or developmental delay in children via next-generation sequencing: a single-center experience.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to understand the genetic etiology in children presenting with epilepsy and/or developmental delay by using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Materials and methods: We included children presenting to our pediatric neurology clinic with a diagnosis of epilepsy and/or developmental delay between January 2019 and December 2021. We evaluated the patients using the NGS equipment in our genetic laboratory. Results: In total, 90 patients were included in the study. Twenty (34.4%) out of 58 patients who had undergone whole-exome sequencing (WES) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and 11 (18.9%) had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Five (41.6%) out of 12 patients who had undergone whole-genome sequencing had P/LP variants and 5 (41.6%) had VUS. Eleven (55%) out of 20 patients who had undergone WES and chromosomal microarray had P/LP variants and 2 (10%) had VUS. Twenty-six novel variants were described. Twelve patients (13.3%) were diagnosed using a known specific treatment. Conclusion: NGS aids in precisely diagnosing children with epilepsy and/or developmental delay. Furthermore, it provides a correct prognosis, specific treatment methods, and a multidisciplinary approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.