ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Eliglustat substrate reduction therapy in children with Gaucher disease type 1.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: A state-of-the-art review.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesPooled it
- Caregiver Reports of Neurodevelopmental Functions in Pediatric Lysosomal Storage Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- From molecular mechanisms of glycosphingolipid function to bio-therapeutic applications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Sphingolipid metabolism and hematologic disorders: current understanding and future directions.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Lipidomic Signatures in Pediatric Metabolic Disorders.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Development of a Lentiviral Vector for High-Yield Production of Synthetic and Recombinant GCase for Gaucher Disease Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder with limited treatment options for pediatric patients. Oral substrate reduction therapy (SRT) with eliglustat offers a potential alternative, particularly for those with barriers to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Objective: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of eliglustat SRT in pediatric patients with type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1), both as initial therapy and as a switch from intravenous ERT. Design: A prospective case series was conducted from 2017 to 2024. Setting: Yale's National Gaucher Disease Treatment Center, New Haven, CT, United States. Participants: Fourteen pediatric GD1 patients with significant barriers to receiving ERT. Intervention: Eliglustat SRT was dosed pharmacogenomically based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status. Primary outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes included safety and efficacy in reversing indicators of disease activity. Secondary outcomes involved changes in patient and parent-reported quality of life, assessed using PROMIS questionnaires. Results: Eliglustat was initiated at a mean age of 12.5 years (range: 6-17 years) and administered for a mean duration of 3.6 years (range: 1-7 years). All patients remained on treatment and exhibited sustained reductions in glucosylsphingosine (GlcSph) levels compared to baseline ( Conclusions: Eliglustat demonstrated significant clinical benefits in pediatric GD1 patients, as evidenced by reductions in GlcSph levels and other disease indicators. The therapy showed a favorable safety profile comparable to that observed in adults. These findings suggest eliglustat is a promising therapeutic option for pediatric GD1 patients, providing an effective alternative to ERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.