ArticleClinical medicine insights. Case reports2025
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection-Different Faces of the Same Disease.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chest Discomfort: Could Coronary Pathology Extend Beyond Atherosclerosis?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we present 2 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the course of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. The first patient, a female admitted with STEMI, was diagnosed with SCAD with intravascular imaging and treated with IVUS-guided PCI. In the second patient, a young male hospitalized due to angina and STEMI, SCAD was not identified initially, and the patient was treated conservatively. Based on these cases, we show different faces of the same disease that imply different diagnostics and management strategies. We draw attention to the fact that the disease affects not only young women without atherosclerotic risk factors and that it is not always possible to avoid generally not recommended invasive treatment and anticoagulant therapy. The paper also discusses the disease's pathophysiology and its diagnosis methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.